As I’m sure all of you know, I have a policy of not sharing opinions about politics on Facebook. I don’t believe Facebook is a great platform for discussing things that we all tend to feel passionate about, unless those passions are strongly loving and able to be expressed positively. But I am challenged by my friend, Gina Bell’s post, to break with my tradition about that policy this once. At least the politics part of it—not the loving and positive one. I hope I can express my beliefs lovingly and positively here. I never want to offend anyone, not because I’m afraid of their reaction, but because I don’t want to hurt anyone, or add more heat than light to whatever issue we’re talking about. I want everything I share here to be not only truthful and loving but uplifting and profitable for making the world a better place. So here goes: my break with tradition—my thoughts on the current political climate in the U.S. Like many of my Facebook friends, I am worried ...
This article was originally posted in the FECB blog on January 22, 2013 We mean well. We really want our friends to know Jesus. But too often we approach them with wrong ideas in our heads. If we really want to be effective witnesses, we should be aware of five common myths about evangelism. Myth #1: There are two kinds of people: them and us. It's a mistake to see everyone as being on one side of the fence or the other. That's not the appropriate metaphor. There's no fence. There's a road, and we're all walking on it. For sure, there's a point in every person's journey when they choose to follow Jesus. But it's only a step along the path. The road continues. None of us has arrived until we get to heaven, and we're all learning as we go. The people we want to share Jesus with are just fellow travelers. Realizing this opens up a whole new way of seeing others, and it will cha...
My friend, Margaret Ezzet, in her own thoughtful way, Gave me two lovely presents this past Christmas Day. The first was the pencils—I’ve shown you a picture— That give me permission your grammar to censure. (I stand by my mix of the past and the present. It works in this case, even if it seems like it doesn’t.) That gift also stumped me a bit, by the way, with a problem that’s stumped us grammarians to this day: that’s how to decide whether “pencils” is single, when they come in one box in which they all mingle, (not to mention us poets who now and then struggle to make their poems rhyme without making up new words) The second gift she gave me is a book obviously intentioned (by an author with no struggle like the one I just mentioned) To give us a chuckle every day of the year— (not just one chuckle, I need to make clear, But 366 chuckles—one poem for EACH DAY of the year!) Whew! Th...
Comments